Abstract
This study examined the impact of key processing stages and flock variables on the prevalence of Campylobacter on broiler carcasses. Overall, the prevalence of Campylobacter was 62% in caeca, and 68%, 65% and 62% in neck skin samples collected after evisceration, final wash and carcass chilling, respectively. Campylobacter were found in 32% of caeca, and 52%, 40% and 32% of neck skin samples collected after evisceration, final wash and carcass chilling, respectively from first thin broiler batches. Final thin broiler batches were more frequently contaminated with prevalences of 83% found in caeca, 80% in neck skin samples collected after evisceration and 83% found in neck skin samples collected after both final wash and carcass chilling stages (p < 0.05). Thinning status had a significant effect on Campylobacter counts with significantly higher counts observed in samples from final thin batches (p < 0.05). Highest Campylobacter concentrations in neck skin samples were observed at the evisceration stage in both first and final thin samples, with counts ranging from 2.0 to 3.8 log10 CFU/g and 2.3 to 4.8 log10 CFU/g in first and final thin batches, respectively. All first thin samples had counts below the European Union (EU) Process Hygiene Criterion threshold level of 3 log10 CFU/g after chilling while 52% of final thin batches had counts above this limit.
Disciplines
Biology
DOI
10.1016/j.fm.2020.103688
Full Publication Date
January 2020
Publisher
Elsevier
Funder Name 1
Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Ireland
Award Number 1
15/F/641
Resource Type
journal article
Access Rights
open access
License Condition

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Alternative Identifier
https://www-sciencedirect-com.cit.idm.oclc.org/science/article/pii/S074000202030277X?via%3Dihub
Recommended Citation
Emanowicz, M. et al., 2020. The impact of key processing stages and flock variables on the prevalence and levels of Campylobacter on broiler carcasses. Food Microbiology, p.103688. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2020.103688.
Publication Details
Food Microbiology
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd