Authors

Paul Bowyer, Climate Service Center Germany (GERICS), Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon, Hamburg, Germany
Silvia Maria Alfieri, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
Bidroha Basu, Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, Munster Technological University Cork, IrelandFollow
Emilie Cremin, School of Social & Environmental Sustainability, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
Sisay Debele, Global Centre for Clean Air Research (GCARE), School of Sustainability, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Surrey , United Kingdom
Prashant Kumar, Global Centre for Clean Air Research (GCARE), School of Sustainability, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Surrey, United Kingdom; Institute for Sustainability, University of Surrey, Surrey, United Kingdom; School of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
Veronika Lechner, Department for Natural Hazards, Austrian Research Centre for Forests , Innsbruck, Austria
Michael Loupis, General Department, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Psachna, Greece; Innovative Technologies Centre S.A. (ITC), Athens, Greece
Massimo Menenti, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands; State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Sciences, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Slobodan Mickovski, Built Environment Asset Management Centre, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
Jan Pfeiffer, Institute for Interdisciplinary Mountain Research, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Innsbruck, Austria
Francesco Pilla, School of Architecture, Planning and Environmental Policy, University College Dublin, Ireland
Beatrice Pulvirenti, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Paolo Ruggieri, Department of Physics and Astronomy "Augusto Righi", University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Arunima Sarkar Basu, Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
Christos Spyrou, Innovative Technologies Centre S.A. (ITC), Athens, Greece; Academy of Athens, Research Centre for Atmospheric Physics and Climatology, Athens, Greece
Silvia Unguendoli, Hydro-Meteo-Climate Structure of the Agency for Prevention, Environment and Energy of Emilia-Romagna, Arpae-SIMC, Bologna , Italy
Thomas Zieher, Department for Natural Hazards, Austrian Research Centre for Forests , Innsbruck, Austria
Silviana di Sabatino, Department of Physics and Astronomy "Augusto Righi", University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

ORCID

0000-0002-8822-7167

Abstract

The use of nature-based solutions (NbS) to address the risks posed by hydro-meteorological hazards have not yet become part of the mainstream policy response, and one of the main reasons cited for this, is the lack of evidence that they can effectively reduce disaster risk. This paper addresses this issue, by providing model-based evidence from five European case studies which demonstrate the effectiveness of five different NbS in reducing the magnitude of the hazard and thus risk, in present-day and possible future climates. In OAL-Austria, the hazard is a deep-seated landslide, and the NbS analysed is afforestation. Modelling results show that in today's climate and a landcover scenario of mature forest, a reduction in landslide velocity of 27.6 % could be achieved. In OAL-Germany, the hazard is river flooding and the NbS analysed is managed grazing with removal of woody vegetation. Modelling results show that the NbS could potentially reduce maximum flood water depth in the near-future (2031–2060) and far-future (2070–2099), by 0.036 m and 0.155 m, respectively. In OAL-Greece, the hazard is river flooding, and the NbS is upscaled natural storage reservoirs. Modelling results show that in a possible future climate the upscaled NbS show most potential in reducing the total flooded area by up to 1.26 km2. In OAL-Ireland, the hazard is surface and river flooding, and the NbS is green roofs. Results from a modelled upscaling analysis under two different climate scenarios show that both maximum flood water depth, and total flooded area were able to be reduced. In OAL-UK, the hazard is shallow landslides, and the NbS is high-density planting of two different tree species. Modelling results under two different climate scenarios show that both tree species were able to improve slope stability, and that this increased over time as the NbS matured. The significance of these results is discussed within the context of the performance of the NbS over time, to different magnitude events, impact with stakeholders in engendering wider support for the adoption of the NbS in the OALs, and the uncertainty in the modelling analyses.

Disciplines

Civil and Environmental Engineering

DOI

10.1016/j.nbsj.2024.100127

Full Publication Date

16-5-2024

Publication Details

Nature-Based Solutions

Publisher

Elsevier

Funder Name 1

Horizon 2020 - OPERANDUM (OPEn-air laboRAtories for Nature based solutions to Manage hydro-meteo risks) projects

Award Number 1

776848

Resource Type

journal article

Resource Version

http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85

Access Rights

open access

Open Access Route

Gold Open Access

License Condition

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Alternative Identifier

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772411524000181?via%3Dihub#refdata001

Share

COinS